Maybe this is just me, but if the media are looking for cheap stunts to put the candidates in some trapdoor moments, I am not so much of a fan of the whole, "...would you have invaded Iraq" schtick. All it comes down to is dwelling in the past.
What I would rather see them asking are questions that might reflect action that can actually change things, if they are actually elected. Well, you know, besides questions that might actually be relevant to how they govern. But for some reason, such questions never really seem to be on the table.
So, to the media who want to ask Jeb and the other Republican candidates these inane and purely pedantic questions, I have one for you:
"Are you in favor of prosecuting members of the Bush administration for any illegal misconduct still actionable under a court of law, or would you grant them pardons if such prosecution was occurring?"
I wonder how Jeb would put a fresh spin on that. Or any of the GOP candidates.
But, what am I saying. It would be fair game to ask HRC and Sanders as well.
Topic for the comments: If you had the opportunity to ask any of the Presidential candidates one question, which is essentially irrelevant (so, no TPP, for example) but could potentially embarrass the shit out of them, what would you ask?